Tapping In: the rich reservoir of digital added-value services in container logistics

Nicholas Gallie
Chief Operating Officer
May 26, 2021
6 min read

Data is the new oil. This aphorism has been repeated to the point of cliché, and it misleadingly ascribes scarcity to a growing, renewable resource. Data is everywhere, gushing through our silicon wells at a rate of 2.5 exabytes a day⁽¹⁾ — enough to fill 45 containers’ worth of servers⁽¹ᵃ⁾, were it all to be stored. Rising in tandem with (and as a consequence of) our information hoarding are software systems —machine learning, deep learning, and other terms under the “AI umbrella”— capable of spotting patterns within staggeringly large datasets and, occasionally, drawing insightful conclusions from them.

This box probably doesn't have much data in it.

The shipping industry is no stranger to data. The very word “logistics” likely originates from the ancient Greek logistika (to count/calculate)⁽²⁾⁽³⁾; the abacus was first used by merchants to keep track of inventory⁽⁴⁾; the earliest known analogue to the modern bill of lading was made in 15 CE⁽⁵⁾. The transfer of information is inherent to the transportation of cargo, and much of modern logistics’ regulatory-administrative apparatus concerns the timely, orderly and secure transfer of this information. The advent of new technology offers more than marginal improvements in information sharing: it also offers more than systemic improvements in information-sharing methods. In fact, the Digital Age presents cargo movers with entirely new methods of adding value to the supply chain.

A box full of data

It is natural to ask whether the modern exploitation and commercialization of data has occurred within container logistics to the same extent it has in other fields such as aviation and manufacturing. An instinctive response might be that it has: administrative fees are built into shipping costs; contract rates are informed by knowledge of externalities such as oil prices and aggregate demand⁽⁶⁾; the freight forwarding business exists partly due to shippers’ inability/disinterest in logistical information processing. The movement and usage of data, essential to the shipping process, is also a component of container transport through which revenue is made.

On the other hand, this picture might be met by derision from the digitally-native, who until recently considered maritime transport a technological backwater, and where there is still plenty of “room to grow”: a single avocado shipment from Mombasa to Rotterdam can involve 30 different parties, 100 people and 200 unique exchanges of information⁽⁷⁾ (still routinely done via telephone, fax and “snail mail”⁽⁸⁾). Although the persons, procedures and paperwork involved have evolved over time, the fundamental exchange of information has remained unchanged for thousands of years: to some outsiders, recent and substantial innovation in this space is nowhere to be seen. Moreover, despite the industry already generating 120 million unique data points a day⁽⁹⁾ with plenty more on the way, little is being done to explore and exploit that data to the benefit of shippers and/or service providers.

That's a lot of work for some avocados.

However you perceive the digital prowess of container logistics, there is one thing which both the perspectives above have in common: they mainly consider data as a tool to help optimize moving the box from A to B. There is an intuitive logic to this approach, given that the very purpose of containerization is to facilitate the movements of goods; furthermore, there are still ingrained bureaucratic obstacles which even rudimentary data sharing practices have yet to overcome⁽¹⁰⁾. On the other hand, keeping the spotlight on “essential” digitalization precludes the possibility of using information technology to break free from containerization’s encroaching commoditization and add novel value to cargo shippers.

Chasing new horizons

Intermodal containers have become the de facto mode of long-distance transport for many categories of goods, with markets now effectively saturated with providers and competitively dense; hence, container shipping lines and terminal operators are under increasing pressure to maintain a competitive edge. The simplest way to do so is to increase market share, and some shipping lines are indeed pursuing this option⁽¹¹⁾⁽¹²⁾, particularly given their recent cash uptick⁽¹³⁾⁽¹⁴⁾; naturally, horizontal growth in a crowded market is an uphill battle, and is constrained in the long run by the gentle swells of the global economy. Testament to this is the habit of consolidation within liner shipping, which has done little to improve profit margins since it became trendy two decades ago⁽¹⁵⁾.

Buying more ships has not increased profit margins.

It thus follows that companies in the sector are also looking for vertical growth opportunities. This implies expansion into adjacent aspects of container logistics — a strategy that some liners and terminal operators have whole-heartedly thrown themselves into by striving to provide end-to-end services for shippers⁽¹⁶⁾⁽¹⁷⁾. The diversification of business activities ostensibly decreases a company’s risk exposure⁽¹⁸⁾: given the close-knit nature of container operations, though, the extent of this benefit is limited. The end-to-end expansion approach also brings risks of its own⁽¹⁹⁾⁽²⁰⁾; furthermore, the benefits of vertical integration to cargo owners cannot be taken for granted.

Too often, the homogeneous nature of container shipping leads people to consider horizontal and vertical growth as the only two dimensions along which companies can expand their obtainable market size. Beyond tending towards a false dichotomy, this conceptualization is belied by the possibility of improving your offering to your existing customer base and thus adding value: put more simply, container transport needn’t be as commoditized as it is arguably becoming⁽²¹⁾.

Drilling down

Steps are already being taken in this direction. Low-tech “value-added services” are already commonplace across the board; many shipping websites now feature entire sections dedicated to these added-value services. While many products comprise intrinsic variations in shipment priority and container quality, there is a growing presence of innovative digital solutions on display. Multiple liners offer real-time monitoring services for reefer/high-value cargo⁽²²⁾⁽²³⁾⁽²⁴⁾⁽²⁵⁾, while others promote ever-clearer visibility and command over transactions of cargo and information⁽²⁶⁾⁽²⁷⁾ - the latter being the very data exchanges the industry is scrambling to digitalize (q.v.: the long-overdue electronic bills of lading⁽²⁸⁾⁽²⁹⁾).

The digitalization of shipping data opens up all sorts of opportunities.

While most of these shipper-facing initiatives are being promoted by the liners⁽³⁰⁾ (and, to some extent, freight forwarders⁽³¹⁾), it would be simplistic to ignore the role container terminals have in the provision of these added-value services. Being the focal points between intermodal movements puts ports in the ideal position to act as intelligent disseminators of data⁽³²⁾; it’s no accident that the top three ports in Europe are each betting on their own data-sharing systems (Rotterdam⁽³³⁾, Antwerp⁽³⁴⁾, and Hamburg⁽³⁵⁾), nor that major terminal operators at these ports are also striving to become “one-stop shop” data providers⁽³⁶⁾⁽³⁷⁾⁽³⁸⁾. Whether or not they are aware of it, container terminals are well on their way both to providing digital value-adding services themselves, as well as enabling the provision of these services by connected stakeholders.

Cargo owners have been feeling the squeeze.

Breaching the future

How are shippers reacting to value-adding digital services in container logistics? The net momentum amongst cargo owners tends towards cautious, yet curious experimentation⁽³⁹⁾. The successive impacts of COVID-19 and the container capacity squeeze have accelerated this trend⁽⁴⁰⁾, with shippers under renewed pressure to reinforce their supply chains by trying out data-driven “performance enhancements” promoted by freight forwarders in need of differentiation⁽⁴¹⁾.

The forwarders aren’t alone: container lines fighting the “accelerated relegation to moving containers from point A to point B”⁽³⁹⁾ are also wising up to the necessity of embracing digital futures in order to stand out to a tough crowd⁽⁴²⁾. Far from being passive spectators of the adaptations occurring on their premises, port authorities and terminal operators have been proactively supporting the provision of digital added-value services, in order to retain their places as the foci of trade. Stagnant logistical habits across the sector are being stirred by faster, smarter, more versatile techniques for moving goods and sharing information about these movements.

Hemingway once noted that change happens in two ways: “gradually, then suddenly”⁽⁴³⁾. The “gradual” change has begun encircling the oil economy⁽⁴⁴⁾⁽⁴⁵⁾ — something shipping lines can already see on the horizon⁽⁴⁶⁾. Digital change is happening across all facets of intermodal transport — gradually, then suddenly. The transformation of the humble container into a smart, versatile source of information is taking place gradually, and is poised to become sudden: let us ensure that we make the most of it.

Nicholas Gallie is ConexBird's Chief Operating Officer, and is focused on maximizing ConexBird's potential to transform container logistics by delivering tailored solutions to stakeholders across the intermodal supply chain.

(1) - Marr, Bernard. “How Much Data Do We Create Every Day? The Mind-Blowing Stats Everyone Should Read.” Forbes, 21 May 2018, www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/05/21/how-much-data-do-we-create-every-day-the-mind-blowing-stats-everyone-should-read/?sh=5e282cfb60ba. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(1a) - Estimated, based on 22G1 Dry Van containers, a typical server storage capacity of 12 TB and a server volume of 7,175.698 cm3, as per an HP ProLiant DL20 Gen10 - P17081-B21 server

(2) - Rodrigue, Jean-Paul. “7.4 – Logistics and Freight Distribution | The Geography of Transport Systems.” Transport Geography, transportgeography.org/contents/chapter7/logistics-freight-distribution/. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(3) - Tepic, Jovan & Tanackov, Ilija & Stojić, Gordan. (2011). Ancient logistics - historical timeline and etymology. Tehnicki Vjesnik. 18. 379-384.

(4) - Fernandes, Luis. “The Abacus: A Brief History.” Ryerson University, 2013, www.ee.ryerson.ca/~elf/abacus/history.html. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(5) - du Toit, SF. The Evolution of the Bill of Lading. University of South Africa, 8 Dec. 2005.

(6) - Reyhan, Emre. “Contract Negotiations in Shipping.” More than Shipping, 3 Nov. 2016, www.morethanshipping.com/contract-negotiations-shipping/. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(7) - Landon, Felicity. “Maersk, Avocados and the Global Trade Paperchase.” Seatrade Maritime, 29 Nov. 2017, www.seatrade-maritime.com/europe/maersk-avocados-and-global-trade-paperchase. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(8) - Paris, Costas, and Mike Sudal. “With Container Ships Getting Bigger, Maersk Focuses on Getting Faster.” Wall Street Journal, 20 Dec. 2018, www.wsj.com/articles/with-container-ships-getting-bigger-maersk-focuses-on-getting-faster-11545301800. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(9) - Trelleborg Marine Systems, and Port Technology. “Use of Big Data in the Maritime Industry.” Paterson Simons, June 2018.

(10) - Moschovou, T, et al. “Challenges for Data Sharing in Freight Transport.” ResearchGate, National Technical University of Athens, June 2019, www.researchgate.net/publication/334250327_Challenges_for_data_sharing_in_freight_transport.

(11) - MundoMarítimo. “MSC Se Apresta Para Convertirse En La Línea Naviera Número 1 Del Mundo En 2022.” MundoMarítimo, 16 Apr. 2021, www.mundomaritimo.cl/noticias/msc-se-apresta-para-convertirse-en-la-linea-naviera-numero-1-del-mundo-en-2022. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(12) - Pico, Søren. “Two Container Lines in Particular Expanded Their Fleets in 2020.” ShippingWatch, 30 Dec. 2020, shippingwatch.com/carriers/Container/article12660134.ece. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(13) - Wackett, Mike. “Freight Rate ‘Contagion’ Will Bring a Two-Year ‘Profit Bonanza’ for Ocean Carriers.” The Loadstar, 30 Apr. 2021, theloadstar.com/freight-rate-contagion-will-bring-a-two-year-profit-bonanza-for-ocean-carriers/. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(14) - Chambers, Sam. “Boxship Orderbook-To-Fleet Ratio Closes in on 20%.” Splash247, 17 May 2021, splash247.com/boxship-orderbook-to-fleet-ratio-closes-in-on-20/. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(15) - Sea Traffic Management. “Making a Fragmented and Inefficient Container Industry More Profitable through PortCDM.” Hellenic Shipping News, 24 Aug. 2018, www.hellenicshippingnews.com/making-a-fragmented-and-inefficient-container-industry-more-profitable-through-portcdm/. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(16) - Holmstad, Dag. “Maersk Has ‘Substantial’ Logistics Acquisitions and Decarbonization on Its List of Biggest Risks.” ShippingWatch, 23 Mar. 2021, shippingwatch.com/carriers/Container/article12853078.ece. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(17) - DP World. “Strategy.” DP World, www.dpworld.com/investor-relations/strategy. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(18) - Helfat, Constance E., and David J. Teece. “Vertical Integration and Risk Reduction.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, vol. 3, no. 1, 1987, pp. 47–67. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/764804. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(19) - Shen, Chichen. “Warning over End-To-End Container Shipping Integration.” Lloyd’s Loading List, 15 July 2019, www.lloydsloadinglist.com/freight-directory/news/Warning-over-end-to-end-container-shipping-integration/74642.htm#.YKZcaqgzZ3g. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(20) - Dragomir, Laura. “Vertical and Horizontal Integration in the Maritime Industry: The Impact of the Financial Crisis.” Erasmus University Rotterdam, 22 June 2011.

(21) - Splash247. “Has Shipping Become Commoditised?” Splash247, 24 May 2017, splash247.com/shipping-become-commoditised/. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(22) - ZIM. “ZIMonitor – the Best Way to Track Your Valuable Cargo.” ZIM, 2021, www.zim.com/landing-pages/zimonitor. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(23) - Mediterranean Shipping Company. “Smart Containers.” MSC, www.msc.com/smart-containers. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(24) - CMA CGM. “Smart Containers.” CMA CGM, 2019, www.cma-cgm.com/services/smart-containers.

(25) - Maersk. “Captain PeterTM.” Maersk, 2021, www.maersk.com/supply-chain-logistics/captain-peter. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(26) - ONE. “ECommerce Applications.” Ocean Network Express, www.one-line.com/en/ecommerce-applications. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(27) - ---. “EDI Solutions.” Maersk, 2021, www.maersk.com/supply-chain-logistics/edi-solutions. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(28) - Mediterranean Shipping Company. “MSC EBL: WE MAKE IT SIMPLE ” MSC, www.msc.com/msc-ebl. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(29) - CMA CGM. “BILL OF LADING Paperless.” CMA CGM, www.cma-cgm.com/services/paperless. Accessed 25 May 2021.

(30) - DCSA. “About.” Digital Container Shipping Association, dcsa.org/about#dcsa-members. Accessed 26 May 2021.

(31) - Lennane, Alex. “Freight Forwarders See Greater Profitability in Extending Value.” The Loadstar, 8 Apr. 2016, theloadstar.com/freight-forwarders-see-future-growth-profitability-value-added-services/. Accessed 26 May 2021.

(32) - Johnson, Eric. “Port Technology: Container Gateways Looking to Evolve from Cargo Ports to Data Portals.” Journal of Commerce, 2 Mar. 2020, www.joc.com/port-news/port-data-services/container-gateways-looking-evolve-cargo-ports-data-portals_20200302.html. Accessed 26 May 2021.

(33) - Portbase. “About Us.” Portbase, www.portbase.com/en/about-us/. Accessed 26 May 2021.

(34) - Nxtport. “NxtPort | Unleash the Power of Together!” Nxtport, www.nxtport.com/. Accessed 26 May 2021.

(35) - Dakosy. “Über Uns - DAKOSY Datenkommunikationssystem AG.” Dakosy, www.dakosy.de/ueber-uns. Accessed 26 May 2021.

(36) - Port Technology International Team. “APMT Hails Data-Sharing Benefits of APIs.” Port Technology International, 17 Mar. 2021, www.porttechnology.org/news/apmt-hails-data-sharing-benefits-of-apis/. Accessed 26 May 2021.

(37) - Hutchison Ports ECT Rotterdam. “Information as a Service.” ECT Hutchison Ports, 20 Feb. 2020, www.ect.nl/en/news/fast-forward/information-as-a-service. Accessed 26 May 2021.

(38) - Port Strategy. “PSA: Evolving the Supply Chain.” Port Strategy, Apr. 2021, www.portstrategy.com/news101/world/asia/psa-evolving-the-supply-chain. Accessed 26 May 2021.

(39) - Szakonyi, Mark. “Container Shipping: Value-Add Services in Shipping Take Shape.” Journal of Commerce, 23 Jan. 2019, www.joc.com/maritime-news/container-lines/value-add-services-shipping-take-shape_20190123.html. Accessed 26 May 2021.

(40) - Tirschwell, Peter. “Carriers-Shippers: Premium Container Service Uptake Pulls Industry Away from Commoditization.” Journal of Commerce, 2020, www.joc.com/maritime-news/container-lines/premium-container-service-uptake-pulls-industry-away-commoditization_20201019.html.

(41) - Thuermer, Karen E. “Freight Forwarders: Managing the Storm with Technology.” Logistics Management, 10 May 2021, www.logisticsmgmt.com/article/freight_forwarders_managing_the_storm_with_technology. Accessed 26 May 2021.

(42) - Egloff, Camille, et al. “The Digital Imperative in Container Shipping.” Boston Consulting Group, 19 Aug. 2020, www.bcg.com/publications/2018/digital-imperative-container-shipping

(43) - Hemingway, Ernest. The Sun Also Rises. New York, Scribner, 2016.

(44) - Reed, Stanley. “Shell, in a Turning Point, Says Its Oil Production Has Peaked.” The New York Times, 11 Feb. 2021, www.nytimes.com/2021/02/11/business/shell-oil-production.html. Accessed 26 May 2021.

(45) - McKinsey & Company. “Global Oil Supply-And-Demand Outlook to 2040.” McKinsey, 26 Feb. 2021, www.mckinsey.com/industries/oil-and-gas/our-insights/global-oil-supply-and-demand-outlook-to-2040#. Accessed 26 May 2021.

(46) - Hersher, Rebecca. “The Dawn of Low-Carbon Shipping.” NPR, 16 July 2019, www.npr.org/2019/07/16/716693006/the-dawn-of-low-carbon-shipping?t=1621869844448. Accessed 26 May 2021.

Image Credits

Zukiman Mohammad

Karolina Grabowska

Valeria Burdyka

Taryn Elliott


Charlotte May

It's your call.
Be faster. Know more.
Get in touch with us to find out more about how ConexBird can help your business thrive.
Start Now